[PATCH] of: fix incorrect return value of of_find_matching_node_and_match()
Rob Herring
robherring2 at gmail.com
Sun Jan 20 22:27:53 EST 2013
On 01/20/2013 03:56 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On 20 January 2013 13:50, Rob Herring <robherring2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 01/19/2013 12:20 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>> The of_find_matching_node_and_match() function incorrectly sets the matched
>>> entry to 'matches' when the compatible value of a node matches one of the
>>> possible values. This results in incorrectly selecting the the first entry in
>>> the 'matches' list as the matched entry. Fix this by noting down the result of
>>> the call to of_match_node() and setting that as the matched entry.
>>
>> Looks fine, but is this breaking something in 3.8 or can it wait for 3.9?
>
> Yes, it can wait for 3.9. I am using this function while adding device
> tree support for timers on exynos platform which will probably merged
> in 3.9.
Applied for 3.9. It's in my for-next branch on sources.calxeda.com. This
is a stable branch.
Rob
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas.
>
>>
>> Rob
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham at linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/of/base.c | 6 ++++--
>>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>>> index 2390ddb..960ae5b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>>> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(struct device_node *from,
>>> const struct of_device_id **match)
>>> {
>>> struct device_node *np;
>>> + const struct of_device_id *m;
>>>
>>> if (match)
>>> *match = NULL;
>>> @@ -619,9 +620,10 @@ struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(struct device_node *from,
>>> read_lock(&devtree_lock);
>>> np = from ? from->allnext : of_allnodes;
>>> for (; np; np = np->allnext) {
>>> - if (of_match_node(matches, np) && of_node_get(np)) {
>>> + m = of_match_node(matches, np);
>>> + if (m && of_node_get(np)) {
>>> if (match)
>>> - *match = matches;
>>> + *match = m;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list