[PATCH] of: fix incorrect return value of of_find_matching_node_and_match()
Thomas Abraham
thomas.abraham at linaro.org
Sun Jan 20 16:56:34 EST 2013
On 20 January 2013 13:50, Rob Herring <robherring2 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 01/19/2013 12:20 PM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>> The of_find_matching_node_and_match() function incorrectly sets the matched
>> entry to 'matches' when the compatible value of a node matches one of the
>> possible values. This results in incorrectly selecting the the first entry in
>> the 'matches' list as the matched entry. Fix this by noting down the result of
>> the call to of_match_node() and setting that as the matched entry.
>
> Looks fine, but is this breaking something in 3.8 or can it wait for 3.9?
Yes, it can wait for 3.9. I am using this function while adding device
tree support for timers on exynos platform which will probably merged
in 3.9.
Thanks,
Thomas.
>
> Rob
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/of/base.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> index 2390ddb..960ae5b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -612,6 +612,7 @@ struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(struct device_node *from,
>> const struct of_device_id **match)
>> {
>> struct device_node *np;
>> + const struct of_device_id *m;
>>
>> if (match)
>> *match = NULL;
>> @@ -619,9 +620,10 @@ struct device_node *of_find_matching_node_and_match(struct device_node *from,
>> read_lock(&devtree_lock);
>> np = from ? from->allnext : of_allnodes;
>> for (; np; np = np->allnext) {
>> - if (of_match_node(matches, np) && of_node_get(np)) {
>> + m = of_match_node(matches, np);
>> + if (m && of_node_get(np)) {
>> if (match)
>> - *match = matches;
>> + *match = m;
>> break;
>> }
>> }
>>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list