[kvmarm] [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: KVM: Power State Coordination Interface implementation

[Christoffer Dall]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux at arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:07:31PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> The _very_ good reason here, is that we have two success cases: return
>> to guest and return to user space. As I said, we can save this state
>> in another bit somewhere and change all the KVM/ARM code to do so, but
>> the KVM guys back then would like to use the same convention as other
>> KVM archs.
>
> Can you please credit me for not objecting to returning 0/1 to have
> different success meanings.  What I'm merely objecting to is that
> "return -1" statement in the code (notice the negative sign.)

Sorry if I misunderstood you. Yes, the return -1 has to be changed.

-Christoffer