[kvmarm] [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: KVM: Power State Coordination Interface implementation

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 01:07:31PM -0500, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> The _very_ good reason here, is that we have two success cases: return
> to guest and return to user space. As I said, we can save this state
> in another bit somewhere and change all the KVM/ARM code to do so, but
> the KVM guys back then would like to use the same convention as other
> KVM archs.

Can you please credit me for not objecting to returning 0/1 to have
different success meanings.  What I'm merely objecting to is that
"return -1" statement in the code (notice the negative sign.)