[RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency
Nicolas Pitre
nico at fluxnic.net
Sat Feb 16 00:36:56 EST 2013
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> [130215 05:34]:
> > On Friday 15 February 2013 06:57 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > >On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 06:56:47PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > >>Whats your view on use of arch_ioremap_caller() hook ? This can allow
> > >>us to avoid the dual ioremap() issue discussed here if the hook
> > >>maintains the list of mapped ios.
> > >>
> > >>I was even thinking of having such intelligence within the core
> > >>ioremap code but thought that might be too invasive.
> > >
> > >Why do you even need it? There's no problem with ioremapping the same
> > >space multiple times (you end up with multiple mappings but that
> > >shouldn't be a problem, except for the additional space used.)
> > >
> > It just waste of iospace and Tony insisted to have just single ioremap()
> > hence all this discussion
>
> The main goal is to avoid duplicating data both in hwmod and DT.
> That's pretty much solved as we can have the driver probe populate
> the common data for hwmod from DT as Santosh has already demonstrated.
>
> Then we also want the driver specific idle and reset code to be done
> in the drivers rather than in hwmod and glue it together with hwmod
> using runtime PM. The biggest issue there is how do we reset and idle
> some piece of hardware for PM purposes when there's no driver loaded.
>
> For the duplicate ioremapping, I don't think there's any need to
> do it if we get things right.
Note that if the ioremap matches a static map area there is no cost to
ioremap it multiple times.
Nicolas
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list