[PATCH 3/9] USB: add devicetree helpers for determining dr_mode and phy_type
Sascha Hauer
s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Thu Feb 14 13:30:26 EST 2013
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 08:04:44PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 05:06:55PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > > > > > Maybe we can ignore dr_mode in host-only and device-only builds and only
> > > > > > > look at it for DRD builds ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If something is or is not compiled in the kernel this doesn't mean the kernel
> > > > > > is not started on boards with a different situation.
> > > > >
> > > > > who said kernel wouldn't start ? If you request a host-only build, you
> > > > > need to force your IP into working as host, since that's all you have,
> > > > > either that or you bail out on probe().
> > > >
> > > > Let me clarify, I don't want to use Kconfig to specify my boards
> > > > capabilities. If a kernel is compiled for host mode only and the
> > > > devicetree specifies a port is device-only, then yes, the driver
> > > > should bail out on probe, maybe leaving a message that it found
> > > > a device for which the suitable role is not compiled in.
> > >
> > > yeah, this is why I said we should ignore dr_mode (or bail out) when
> > > !OTG.
> >
> > Ok, that's what the patch effectively does. We have this in chipidea/core.c:
> >
> > | dr_mode = ci->platdata->dr_mode;
> > | if (dr_mode == USB_DR_MODE_UNKNOWN)
> > | dr_mode = USB_DR_MODE_OTG;
> >
> > default to otg if nothing specified.
>
> you missed my point. I wanted something like:
>
> dr_mode = ci->platdata->dr_mode;
> if ((dr_mode == USB_DR_MODE_UNKNOWN) || !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_OTG)
> dr_mode = USB_DR_MODE_OTG;
So everytime the chipidea driver cannot do OTG the driver falls back to
exactly this mode?
>
> this copes with the situation where dr_mode == USB_DR_MODE_HOST but
> kernel is gadget-only.
When I specify dr_mode = USB_DR_MODE_HOST in the devicetree indicating
that my board is only host capable I exactly want the driver to be in
host mode for this device, or to bail out if the kernel does not have
host support compiled in.
Sorry, I still don't get it.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list