[GIT PULL 2nd 3/5] Samsung defconfig update for v3.14
Olof Johansson
olof at lixom.net
Tue Dec 31 13:02:28 EST 2013
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 07:48:26PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
>
>> > The regulator driver causes build breaks. Really, nobody checks these
>> > things before sending patches or merge requests?
>
>> > Having exynos_defconfig broken in arm-soc isn't an alternative. So I
>> > dropped this branch again. If the regulator driver gets fixed in -rc
>> > then we can probably merge it before the merge window, otherwise we'll
>> > have to merge the defconfig change after the regulator fix goes in for
>> > the 3.14 merge window.
>
>> Ah, I guess the fix went in after -rc4, which is the latest -rc that
>> we have in for-next today. I'll bring for-next forward and merge this
>> in.
>
>> Still, it's odd that you were able to test your branch before sending it in.
>
> The build breakage was only introduced in -rc4 - a MFD/RTC change went
> in via Andrew's tree so it got no exposure in -next before it showed up
> in Linus' tree which wasn't good. The fix was in by -rc5, looking at
> the date on the pull request I expect that any testing against -next (as
> opposed to arm-soc) would've been OK and since the branch is based on
> -rc1 it'd have tested out by itself as well.
Ah, yeah, that explains it. Thanks for the clarification.
-Olof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list