[PATCHv12 07/49] clk: divider: add support for low level ops
Gerhard Sittig
gsi at denx.de
Sun Dec 22 12:52:35 EST 2013
[ dropped devicetree, we're clock specific here ]
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 18:34 +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
>
> Divider clock can now be registered to use low level register access ops.
> Preferred initialization method is via clock description.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index 8cfed5c..887e2d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,12 @@ static unsigned long clk_divider_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> struct clk_divider *divider = to_clk_divider(hw);
> unsigned int div, val;
>
> - val = clk_readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift;
> + if (divider->ll_ops)
> + val = divider->ll_ops->clk_readl(divider->reg);
> + else
> + val = clk_readl(divider->reg);
Should this not better always use an ll_ops structure, which
either is individual to the clock item, or is "global" for a
platform, yet can get re-registered at runtime (see the comment
on 06/49)? And why are you referencing clk_readl() instead of
clk_readl_default() which you specifically have introduced in the
previous patch? Adding a copy of the routine and using both the
copy and the original doesn't look right.
virtually yours
Gerhard Sittig
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office at denx.de
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list