[PATCH] dma-buf: avoid using IS_ERR_OR_NULL

Rob Clark robdclark at gmail.com
Sat Dec 21 07:42:17 EST 2013


On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 7:43 PM, Colin Cross <ccross at android.com> wrote:
> dma_buf_map_attachment and dma_buf_vmap can return NULL or
> ERR_PTR on a error.  This encourages a common buggy pattern in
> callers:
>         sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
>         if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt))
>                 return PTR_ERR(sgt);
>
> This causes the caller to return 0 on an error.  IS_ERR_OR_NULL
> is almost always a sign of poorly-defined error handling.
>
> This patch converts dma_buf_map_attachment to always return
> ERR_PTR, and fixes the callers that incorrectly handled NULL.
> There are a few more callers that were not checking for NULL
> at all, which would have dereferenced a NULL pointer later.
> There are also a few more callers that correctly handled NULL
> and ERR_PTR differently, I left those alone but they could also
> be modified to delete the NULL check.
>
> This patch also converts dma_buf_vmap to always return NULL.
> All the callers to dma_buf_vmap only check for NULL, and would
> have dereferenced an ERR_PTR and panic'd if one was ever
> returned. This is not consistent with the rest of the dma buf
> APIs, but matches the expectations of all of the callers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross at android.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/dma-buf.c                         | 18 +++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c                    |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> index 1e16cbd61da2..cfe1d8bc7bb8 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> @@ -251,9 +251,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_put);
>   * @dmabuf:    [in]    buffer to attach device to.
>   * @dev:       [in]    device to be attached.
>   *
> - * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; may return negative
> - * error codes.
> - *
> + * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * for this attachment; returns ERR_PTR on
> + * error.
>   */
>  struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>                                           struct device *dev)
> @@ -319,9 +318,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_detach);
>   * @attach:    [in]    attachment whose scatterlist is to be returned
>   * @direction: [in]    direction of DMA transfer
>   *
> - * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; may return NULL
> - * or ERR_PTR.
> - *
> + * Returns sg_table containing the scatterlist to be returned; returns ERR_PTR
> + * on error.
>   */
>  struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>                                         enum dma_data_direction direction)
> @@ -334,6 +332,8 @@ struct sg_table *dma_buf_map_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach,
>                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
>         sg_table = attach->dmabuf->ops->map_dma_buf(attach, direction);
> +       if (!sg_table)
> +               sg_table = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
>         return sg_table;
>  }
> @@ -544,6 +544,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_mmap);
>   * These calls are optional in drivers. The intended use for them
>   * is for mapping objects linear in kernel space for high use objects.
>   * Please attempt to use kmap/kunmap before thinking about these interfaces.
> + *
> + * Returns NULL on error.
>   */
>  void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>  {
> @@ -566,7 +568,9 @@ void *dma_buf_vmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
>         BUG_ON(dmabuf->vmap_ptr);
>
>         ptr = dmabuf->ops->vmap(dmabuf);
> -       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ptr))
> +       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(ptr)))

since vmap is optional, the WARN_ON might be a bit strong..  although
it would be a bit strange for an exporter to supply a vmap fxn which
always returned NULL, not sure about that.  Just thought I'd mention
it in case anyone else had an opinion about that.

But either way:

Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>


> +               ptr = NULL;
> +       if (!ptr)
>                 goto out_unlock;
>
>         dmabuf->vmap_ptr = ptr;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> index 56805c39c906..bb516fdd195d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object *drm_gem_prime_import(struct drm_device *dev,
>         get_dma_buf(dma_buf);
>
>         sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> -       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt)) {
> +       if (IS_ERR(sgt)) {
>                 ret = PTR_ERR(sgt);
>                 goto fail_detach;
>         }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
> index 59827cc5e770..c786cd4f457b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dmabuf.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object *exynos_dmabuf_prime_import(struct drm_device *drm_dev,
>         get_dma_buf(dma_buf);
>
>         sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(attach, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> -       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt)) {
> +       if (IS_ERR(sgt)) {
>                 ret = PTR_ERR(sgt);
>                 goto err_buf_detach;
>         }
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> index 33d3871d1e13..880be0782dd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf2-dma-contig.c
> @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ static int vb2_dc_map_dmabuf(void *mem_priv)
>
>         /* get the associated scatterlist for this buffer */
>         sgt = dma_buf_map_attachment(buf->db_attach, buf->dma_dir);
> -       if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sgt)) {
> +       if (IS_ERR(sgt)) {
>                 pr_err("Error getting dmabuf scatterlist\n");
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         }
> --
> 1.8.5.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list