[PATCH v2] arm: KVM: Don't return PSCI_INVAL if waitqueue is inactive
Marc Zyngier
marc.zyngier at arm.com
Sat Dec 21 05:54:59 EST 2013
On 2013-12-18 06:26, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> The current KVM implementation of PSCI returns INVALID_PARAMETERS if
> the
> waitqueue for the corresponding CPU is not active. This does not
> seem
> correct, since KVM should not care what the specific thread is doing,
> for example, user space may not have called KVM_RUN on this VCPU yet
> or
> the thread may be busy looping to user space because it received a
> signal; this is really up to the user space implementation. Instead
> we
> should check specifically that the CPU is marked as being turned off,
> regardless of the VCPU thread state, and if it is, we shall
> simply clear the pause flag on the CPU and wake up the thread if it
> happens to be blocked for us.
>
> Further, the implementation seems to be racy when executing multiple
> VCPU threads. There really isn't a reasonable user space programming
> scheme to ensure all secondary CPUs have reached
> kvm_vcpu_first_run_init
> before turning on the boot CPU.
>
> Therefore, set the pause flag on the vcpu at VCPU init time (which
> can
> reasonably be expected to be completed for all CPUs by user space
> before
> running any VCPUs) and clear both this flag and the feature (in case
> the
> feature can somehow get set again in the future) and ping the
> waitqueue
> on turning on a VCPU using PSCI.
>
> Reported-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall at linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier at arm.com>
> ---
> Changes[v2]:
> - Use non-atomic version of test_and_clear_bit instead
> - Check if vcpu is paused and return KVM_PSCI_RET_INVAL if not
> - Remove unnecessary feature bit clear
>
> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
> arch/arm/kvm/psci.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 2a700e0..151eb91 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -478,15 +478,6 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_first_run_init(struct
> kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Handle the "start in power-off" case by calling into the
> - * PSCI code.
> - */
> - if (test_and_clear_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF,
> vcpu->arch.features)) {
> - *vcpu_reg(vcpu, 0) = KVM_PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF;
> - kvm_psci_call(vcpu);
> - }
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -700,6 +691,24 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = kvm_vcpu_set_target(vcpu, init);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Handle the "start in power-off" case by marking the VCPU as
> paused.
> + */
> + if (__test_and_clear_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_POWER_OFF,
> vcpu->arch.features))
> + vcpu->arch.pause = true;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> {
> @@ -713,8 +722,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> if (copy_from_user(&init, argp, sizeof(init)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> - return kvm_vcpu_set_target(vcpu, &init);
> -
> + return kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_vcpu_init(vcpu, &init);
> }
> case KVM_SET_ONE_REG:
> case KVM_GET_ONE_REG: {
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
> index 0881bf1..448f60e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/psci.c
> @@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct
> kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
> }
> }
>
> - if (!vcpu)
> + /*
> + * Make sure the caller requested a valid CPU and that the CPU is
> + * turned off.
> + */
> + if (!vcpu || !vcpu->arch.pause)
> return KVM_PSCI_RET_INVAL;
>
> target_pc = *vcpu_reg(source_vcpu, 2);
>
> - wq = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
> - if (!waitqueue_active(wq))
> - return KVM_PSCI_RET_INVAL;
> -
> kvm_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
>
> /* Gracefully handle Thumb2 entry point */
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static unsigned long kvm_psci_vcpu_on(struct
> kvm_vcpu *source_vcpu)
> vcpu->arch.pause = false;
> smp_mb(); /* Make sure the above is visible */
>
> + wq = kvm_arch_vcpu_wq(vcpu);
> wake_up_interruptible(wq);
>
> return KVM_PSCI_RET_SUCCESS;
--
Fast, cheap, reliable. Pick two.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list