[PATCHv11 01/49] clk: add support for registering clocks from description

[Tero Kristo]

On 12/20/2013 12:53 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Tero Kristo wrote:
>
>> From: Mike Turquette <mturquetter at linaro.org>
>
> Is this E-mail address correct?  It's one byte off of the Signed-off-by:
> address.

No it is not, just my typo there. :P Will fix that for next rev.

>
>> clk_register_desc is the primary interface for populating the clock tree
>> with new clock nodes. In time, this will replace the various hardware-specific
>> registration functions (e.g. clk_register_gate).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo at ti.com>
>> ---
>
> ...
>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> index 2cf2ea6..29281f6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> @@ -1905,6 +1905,77 @@ fail_out:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
>> index 7e59253..7fddcb3 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
>> @@ -161,6 +161,28 @@ struct clk_init_data {
>>   };
>>
>>   /**
>> + * struct clk_desc - clock init descriptor for providing init time parameters
>> + * for a clock.
>> + *
>> + * @name: clock name
>
> As mentioned in
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/294253/
>
> please remove the blank line between the summary line and the arguments.
> Documentation/kernel-doc-nano.txt says:

Yeah, will do similar changes to other patches also.

-Tero

>
> "The @argument descriptions must begin on the very next line following
> this opening short function description line, with no intervening
> empty comment lines."
>
>
> - Paul
>