[PATCH 2/2] gpio: davinci: reuse for Keystone SoC
Grygorii Strashko
grygorii.strashko at ti.com
Mon Dec 16 13:02:25 EST 2013
On 12/16/2013 06:38 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 12 December 2013 01:12 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> The similar GPIO HW block is used by keystone SoCs as
>> in Davinci SoCs.
>> Hence, reuse Davinci GPIO driver for Keystone taking into
>> account that Keystone contains ARM GIC IRQ controller which
>> is implemented using IRQ Chip.
>>
>> Documentation:
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf
>>
>> CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
>> CC: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar at ti.com>
>> CC: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>> CC: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko at ti.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt | 4 +-
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++-----
>> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
>> index a2e839d..4ce9862 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-davinci.txt
>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>> -Davinci GPIO controller bindings
>> +Davinci/Keystone GPIO controller bindings
>>
>> Required Properties:
>> -- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio"
>> +- compatible: should be "ti,dm6441-gpio", "ti,keystone-gpio"
>>
>> - reg: Physical base address of the controller and the size of memory mapped
>> registers.
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> index 73f65ca..3e44e0c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
>> @@ -413,6 +413,27 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops davinci_gpio_irq_ops = {
>> .xlate = irq_domain_xlate_onetwocell,
>> };
>>
>> +static struct irq_chip *davinci_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
>> +{
>> + static struct irq_chip_type gpio_unbanked;
>> +
>> + gpio_unbanked = *container_of(irq_get_chip(irq),
>> + struct irq_chip_type, chip);
>> +
>> + return &gpio_unbanked.chip;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct irq_chip *keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip(unsigned int irq)
>> +{
>> + static struct irq_chip gpio_unbanked;
>> +
>> + gpio_unbanked = *irq_get_chip(irq);
>> + pr_err("keystone_gpio_get_irq_chip\n");
>> + return &gpio_unbanked;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id davinci_gpio_ids[];
>> +
>> /*
>> * NOTE: for suspend/resume, probably best to make a platform_device with
>> * suspend_late/resume_resume calls hooking into results of the set_wake()
>> @@ -433,6 +454,15 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> struct davinci_gpio_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
>> struct davinci_gpio_regs __iomem *g;
>> struct irq_domain *irq_domain = NULL;
>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>> + struct irq_chip *irq_chip;
>> + struct irq_chip *(*gpio_get_irq_chip)(unsigned int irq);
>> +
>> + gpio_get_irq_chip = davinci_gpio_get_irq_chip;
>> + match = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(davinci_gpio_ids),
>> + dev);
>> + if (match)
>> + gpio_get_irq_chip = match->data;
> and if the DT node is not populated ?
>>
>> ngpio = pdata->ngpio;
>> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
>> @@ -442,7 +472,6 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> bank_irq = res->start;
>> -
> stray change..
>
>> if (!bank_irq) {
>> dev_err(dev, "Invalid IRQ resource\n");
>> return -ENODEV;
>> @@ -484,25 +513,22 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> - * AINTC can handle direct/unbanked IRQs for GPIOs, with the GPIO
>> + * INTC can handle direct/unbanked IRQs for GPIOs, with the GPIO
> So you want to have a generic name here. If you are changing it, change it
> across the driver in a separate patch or leave it as is...
> I don't think it matters much..
Uh. Ok. I'll drop renaming.
>
> With those comments addressed, you can add my ack.
> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com>
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list