[PATCH v6 6/7] arm64, jump label: optimize jump label implementation
Jiang Liu
liuj97 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 15 06:07:25 EST 2013
On 12/13/2013 11:52 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:50:23 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:41:04 +0000
>> Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/jump_label.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/jump_label.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/insn.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
>>>
>>> Slightly worrying... this should be CONFIG_HAVE_JUMP_LABEL, right? How did
>>> you manage to test this code?
>>
>> In <linux/jump_label.h> we have:
>>
>> #if defined(CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO) && defined(CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL)
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> # include <asm/jump_label.h>
>
> This also makes the include of <asm/jump_label.h> in the C file
> redundant.
>
> -- Steve
Thanks, Steve.
Will remove the redundant include header file.
>
>> # define HAVE_JUMP_LABEL
>> #endif /* CC_HAVE_ASM_GOTO && CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL */
>>
>>
>> -- Steve
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list