[PATCH 4/6] arm64: topology: Implement basic CPU topology support
Mark Brown
broonie at kernel.org
Thu Dec 12 05:27:57 EST 2013
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 02:59:52PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> On 2013-12-11 22:24, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Lorenzo (on holiday now) pushed the DT topology bindings but there are
> > no patches yet for reading them. I would much prefer to only describe
> > the topology via DT rather than MPIDR (because hardware people sometimes
> > have strange ideas).
> Topology code for ARM32 is based on MPIDR now, should we update it too with
> describing the topology via DT?
Yes, the binding is supposed to apply to both so it'd be good to support
it on pre-v8. However using MPIDR should continue to be supported on
pre-v8 as existing systems don't use the topology binding and so
presumably have accurate MPIDRs, requiring the binding would be a
regression for them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20131212/d51be8f5/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list