[PATCH] arm64: Correct virt_addr_valid
Laura Abbott
lauraa at codeaurora.org
Wed Dec 11 12:35:18 EST 2013
On 12/11/2013 2:44 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 01:23:02AM +0000, Laura Abbott wrote:
>> The definition of virt_addr_valid is that virt_addr_valid should
>> return true if and only if virt_to_page returns a valid pointer.
>> The current definition of virt_addr_valid only checks against the
>> virtual address range. There's no guarantee that just because a
>> virtual address falls bewteen PAGE_OFFSET and high_memory the
>> associated physical memory has a valid backing struct page. Follow
>> the example of other architectures and convert to pfn_valid to
>> verify that the virtual address is actually valid.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
>> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico at linaro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa at codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 3 +--
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> index 3776217..9dc5dc3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> @@ -146,8 +146,7 @@ static inline void *phys_to_virt(phys_addr_t x)
>> #define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET PHYS_PFN_OFFSET
>>
>> #define virt_to_page(kaddr) pfn_to_page(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
>> -#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) (((void *)(kaddr) >= (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) && \
>> - ((void *)(kaddr) < (void *)high_memory))
>> +#define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) pfn_valid(__pa(kaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
>
> Hmm, this is pretty expensive on both arm and arm64, since we end up doing a
> binary search through all of the memblocks.
>
> Are you seeing real problems with the current code?
>
No, thankfully I'm not seeing actual problems at the moment. I found
this while looking at other code. It's also worth noting that almost all
other architectures use this same code as well so I don't see this as
something that would be uniquely bad on ARM.
> Will
>
Laura
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list