[PATCH v2 2/2] arm: omap: remove *.auto* from device names given in usb_bind_phy

[Javier Martinez Canillas]

Hi Kishon,

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Saturday 07 December 2013 02:38 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:14:38PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Previously MUSB wrapper (OMAP) device used PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO while
>>>> creating
>>>> MUSB core device. So in usb_bind_phy (binds the controller with the
>>>> PHY), the
>>>> device name of the controller had *.auto* in it. Since with using
>>>> PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO, there is no way to know the exact device name in
>>>> advance,
>>>> the data given in usb_bind_phy became obsolete and usb_get_phy was
>>>> failing.
>>>> So MUSB wrapper was modified not to use PLATFORM_DEVID_AUTO.
>>>> Corresponding
>>>> change is done in board file here.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-2430sdp.c        |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-3430sdp.c        |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-cm-t35.c         |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-devkit8000.c     |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-ldp.c            |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3beagle.c    |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3logic.c     |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3pandora.c   |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3stalker.c   |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3touchbook.c |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-overo.c          |    2 +-
>>>>   arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51.c           |    2 +-
>>>>   12 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> You can drop this patch since boards files are being removed for v3.14
>>
>>
>> if we can drop this patch, the whole series is invalid, since we'll be
>> using DT phandles to find PHYs going forward, no ?
>>
> yeah. But in one of the other threads, Tony seemed ok to take a patch that
> fixes the same issue in mach-omap2/twl-common.c. So it's better to confirm
> with Tony.
>

Yes, I just read the other thread ("[PATCH] omap: twl-common: Fix
musb-hdrc device name") and I see that these patches are fixing a
v3.13 regression and are meant for the -rc cycle and not for v3.14.

Sorry for the noise then.

Best regards,
Javier


> Thanks
> Kishon