[PATCH 0/5] PM: Enable option of re-use runtime PM callbacks at system suspend
Alan Stern
stern at rowland.harvard.edu
Thu Dec 5 17:21:50 EST 2013
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013, Len Brown wrote:
> This thread raises the question...
>
> Do we still need to have PM_RUNTIME apart from PM_SLEEP?
>
> What is the benefit of being able to build-in one one without the other?
> If that benefit is not significant, perhaps the time has come to
> replace them both with CONFIG_PM...
There are lots of embedded/SoC platforms that implement PM_RUNTIME but
not PM_SLEEP.
Alan Stern
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list