[GIT PULL] s3c64xx dmaengine conversion

[kgene at kernel.org]

Tomasz Figa wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday 04 of December 2013 13:38:39 Olof Johansson wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Mark Brown <broonie at kernel.org> wrote:
> > > The following changes since commit
> 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae:
> > >
> > >   Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800)
> > >
> > > are available in the git repository at:
> > >
> > >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/misc.git
> tags/s3c64xx-dmaengine
> > >
> > > for you to fetch changes up to
> 3faecea70b0d6d050e0ae911032ec340341dc389:
> > >
> > >   spi: s3c64xx: Always select S3C64XX_PL080 when ARCH_S3C64XX is
> enabled (2013-11-24 14:38:25 +0000)
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ARM: s3c64xx: Convert to dmaengine
> > >
> > > This series of commits from Tomasz converting s3c64xx to use dmaengine
> > > rather than the old s3c-dma API missed the v3.13 merge window - Kukjin
> > > said that he'd applied it (which should mean it's OK from a review
> point
> > > of view) but it didn't make it into -next or a pull request.
> > >
> > > Since a s3c64xx based system is one of my primary development
> platforms
> > > it'd be really helpful if I could merge this into both ASoC and SPI,
> > > I've got some patches for ASoC ready to go converting to use dmaengine
> > > directly which help with multiplatform and there's some other
> dmaengine
> > > work for SPI in progress too.  I've therefore made this signed tag,
> it'd
> > > be great if it could be merged into both arm-soc and those two trees.
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > I'm open to other ideas for doing this, I'd just really like to see
> the
> > > code building on this go in this cycle so anything that accomplishes
> > > that is good for me.
> >
> > It's been 10 days and Kukjin hasn't moved on this, nor replied. I'm
> > going to merge it into arm-soc as samsung/s3c64xx-dmaengine ->
> > next/drivers so that you can use the branch as a base for your work.
> 
Oops, I have no idea why I missed that :-(
Sorry about that. Olof, thanks for your taking anyway.

- Kukjin

> OK, thanks.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz