[GIT PULL] DaVinci fixes for v3.13-rc3

[Sekhar Nori]

+ Peter

Hi Olof,

On 12/5/2013 4:03 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Pulled.
> 
> A suggestion for the future, please try to use a patch description
> that doesn't require you to motivate why this is needed now. I.e. the
> patch description should contain:
> 
> What is broken
> How/when it broke (SHA or general timeframe)
> How it's fixed
> 
> In this case, it wasn't obvious what the actual breakage was (i.e.
> audio not working), nor when it was introduced.
> 
> Of course, if something is trivial you don't need to fill it in, nor
> should it be a form-based description. But those three answers should
> generally be possible to find in the patch description for a bugfix.

Yes, understood. I generally do push back on this and this time I (quite
unnecessarily) tried supplementing the information missing in
description through the tag signing message. Should have made sure the
commit description has the required information instead.

Thanks,
Sekhar