[PATCH 00/04] ARM: shmobile: Use SoC suffix for INTC compat string

[Magnus Damm]

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 08:14:50AM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> ARM: shmobile: Use SoC suffix for INTC compat string
>>
>> [PATCH 01/04] ARM: shmobile: Use sh73a0 suffix for INTC compat string
>> [PATCH 02/04] ARM: shmobile: Use r8a7740 suffix for INTC compat string
>> [PATCH 03/04] ARM: shmobile: Use r8a7778 suffix for INTC compat string
>> [PATCH 04/04] ARM: shmobile: Use r8a7779 suffix for INTC compat string
>>
>> Update the DTS for INTC irqpin devices to include the SoC in the compat string.
>>
>> Both IRQC and INTC irqpin need documentation for the DT bindings, and this
>> will happen in incremental patches.
>
> I have posted some patches for that a few moments ago :)

Thanks for that!

> I am curious to if it is intentional that this series replaces
> the use of less-specific compat strings with more specific ones
> while the recent update to the r8a7790 supplemented the
> less-specific renesas,irqc comat string with the more-specific
> renesas,irqc-r8a7790 compat string.
>
> i.e.
>         before: "renesas,intc-irqpin"
>         after:  "renesas,intc-irqpin-sh73a0"
>
>         as opposed to
>
>         before: "renesas,irqc"
>         after: "renesas,irqc-r8a7790", "renesas,irqc"

My intention is to keep them the same. I just checked the intc-irqpin
patches but they seem to be following the same style as IRQC. On which
SoC did you observe this difference?

Thanks,

/ magnus