[PATCH RESEND v5 1/2] PWM: PXA: add device tree support to PWM driver

[Haojian Zhuang]

On 12/04/2013 05:03 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 09:12:51AM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> On 12/04/2013 02:45 AM, Mike Dunn wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2013 02:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:19:33PM -0700, Mike Dunn wrote:
>>>>> This patch adds device tree support to the PXA's PWM driver.  Nothing
>>>>> needs to be extracted from the device tree node by the PWM device.
>>>>> Client devices need only specify the period; the per-chip index is
>>>>> implicitly zero because one device node must be present for each PWM
>>>>> output in use.  This approach is more convenient due to the wide
>>>>> variability in the number of PWM channels present across the various PXA
>>>>> variants, and is made possible by the fact that the register sets for
>>>>> each PWM channel are segregated from each other.  An of_xlate() method
>>>>> is added to parse this single-cell node.  The existing ID table is
>>>>> reused for the match table data.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on a Palm Treo 680 (both platform data and DT cases).
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mike Dunn <mikedunn at newsguy.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt | 30 +++++++++++++
>>>>>   drivers/pwm/pwm-pxa.c                             | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>   2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pxa-pwm.txt
>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>
>>>> It looks like this fell through the cracks. Is this patch still the
>>>> latest one you have? Should it still be applied?
>>>>
>>>> Thierry
>>>>
>>> Hi Thierry,
>>>
>>> Funny I should hear from you about this today.... I just turned my attention
>>> back to this today and noticed that it never made it into your for-next branch.
>>>   Yes, it is the latest.  If the patch still applies cleanly, please feel free.
>>> Otherwise, I'd be glad to rework it against something more recent.
>>>
>>> Also, we never got any ACKs for patch 2/2, which just adds the nodes to
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/pxa27x.dtsi
>>> Any advice on whom to nudge?
>>>
>>> Thanks much!
>>> Mike
>>>
>> It's fine to me.
>>
>> Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org>
> I think it's customary to take DTS file updates through the architecture
> trees, so I think it'd be better if you took patch 2/2. There aren't any
> dependencies between both patches either.
>
> Thierry
OK. Let me handle this.

Regards
Haojian