[RFC part1 PATCH 5/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arm_core.c and its related head file

[Mark Rutland]

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:36:49PM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> introduce arm_core.c and its related head file, after this patch,
> we can get ACPI tables from BIOS on ARM64 now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Al Stone <al.stone at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory at linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h |   57 +++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c     |    8 ++
>  drivers/acpi/Makefile         |    2 +
>  drivers/acpi/plat/Makefile    |    1 +
>  drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c  |  219 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 287 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/plat/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/plat/arm-core.c
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index c186f5b..e9444e4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,43 @@
>  #ifndef _ASM_ARM_ACPI_H
>  #define _ASM_ARM_ACPI_H
>  
> +#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +
> +#define COMPILER_DEPENDENT_INT64	long long
> +#define COMPILER_DEPENDENT_UINT64	unsigned long long

Given we've already pulled in linux/init.h, which has pulled in
linux/types.h, is there any reason we can't use s64 and u64 here?

If we can, then why don't we unify this further up so each arch doesn't
have to define this redundantly?

> +
> +/*
> + * Calling conventions:
> + *
> + * ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE        - Interfaces to host OS (handlers, threads)
> + * ACPI_EXTERNAL_XFACE      - External ACPI interfaces
> + * ACPI_INTERNAL_XFACE      - Internal ACPI interfaces
> + * ACPI_INTERNAL_VAR_XFACE  - Internal variable-parameter list interfaces
> + */
> +#define ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE
> +#define ACPI_EXTERNAL_XFACE
> +#define ACPI_INTERNAL_XFACE
> +#define ACPI_INTERNAL_VAR_XFACE
> +
> +/* Asm macros */
> +#define ACPI_FLUSH_CPU_CACHE() flush_cache_all()

Can you elaborate on when ACPI needs to use this? 

Thanks,
Mark.