[PATCH] ARM: DT: Exynos5250: fix number of interrupt-cells in mct node
Chander Kashyap
chander.kashyap at linaro.org
Wed Aug 28 08:06:50 EDT 2013
On 28 August 2013 16:48, Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Chander,
>
> On Wednesday 28 of August 2013 16:30:41 Chander Kashyap wrote:
>> Two cells were used to specify interrupts in mct node, while second cell
>> always remains unused. Hence use only one cell.
>> Suggested by Tomasz Figa.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap at linaro.org>
>> ---
>> changes in v2:
>> - Drop Changes for Exynos4 as done in separate patch by Tomasz
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 19 +++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi index ef57277..f2f178a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi
>> @@ -102,23 +102,22 @@
>> compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-mct";
>> reg = <0x101C0000 0x800>;
>> interrupt-controller;
>> - #interrups-cells = <2>;
>> + #interrups-cells = <1>;
>
> Those two properties above are unused and in fact incorrect, because MCT is
> not an interrupt controller, so they could be removed in a follow-up patch.
Thanks for the correction. I will remove them.
>
> You can also check out the clean-up series I mentioned for other things
> that could be cleaned up in Exynos 5 dtsi files.
ok
>
>> interrupt-parent = <&mct_map>;
>> - interrupts = <0 0>, <1 0>, <2 0>, <3 0>,
>> - <4 0>, <5 0>;
>> + interrupts = <0>, <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>;
>> clocks = <&clock 1>, <&clock 335>;
>> clock-names = "fin_pll", "mct";
>>
>> mct_map: mct-map {
>> - #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> #address-cells = <0>;
>> #size-cells = <0>;
>> - interrupt-map = <0x0 0 &combiner 23 3>,
>> - <0x1 0 &combiner 23 4>,
>> - <0x2 0 &combiner 25 2>,
>> - <0x3 0 &combiner 25 3>,
>> - <0x4 0 &gic 0 120 0>,
>> - <0x5 0 &gic 0 121 0>;
>> + interrupt-map = <0 &combiner 23 3>,
>> + <1 &combiner 23 4>,
>> + <2 &combiner 25 2>,
>> + <3 &combiner 25 3>,
>> + <4 &gic 0 120 0>,
>> + <5 &gic 0 121 0>;
>> };
>> };
>
> Otherwise, looks fine. Thanks.
Thanks
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
--
with warm regards,
Chander Kashyap
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list