Broken device trees for exynos in linux-next

[Olof Johansson]

Kukjin,

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene at kernel.org> wrote:
> Yeah, it can be used for test. But there are many differences between
> exynos_defconfig and exynos5440_defconfig...PCIe, GbE, HugeTLB and KVM...so
> I'm still wondering how to handle it without other defconfig.
>
> Olof, do you still having objection for exynos5440_defconfig? If so, OK I
> will revert exynos5440_defconfig for now so that I could pull out the
> 'defconfig' branch to arm-soc for upcoming merge window. Then, let's discuss
> again :)

As far as I see it, you have two options:

1. Add the needed drivers to multi_v7_defconfig and use that for your platform.
2. Add them to both multi_v7_defconfig and exynos_defconfig.

Enabling the new drivers on exynos_defconfig does no harm.

I don't want to see a new defconfig for this.


-Olof