[PATCH 1/3] misc: Add crossbar driver

[Sricharan R]

Hi Linus,

On Thursday 22 August 2013 02:40 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
> <santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> (...)
>>> Sorry I don't understand what thread that is... can you point me there?
>>> My previous statement on this issue what this:
>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=137442541628641&w=2
> (...)
>>>> I don't see how you can make this happen with an irqchip
>>>> infrastructure.
>>> I think my post above describes this.
>>>
>> Sorry for being dumb but I don't think cascaded irqchip examples
>> like GPIO and cross-bars are same. If you take an example of
>> GPIO irqchip, it always have a physical connection even if it
>> is 1 IRQ line for (32 logical/sparse IRQs). That goes with
>> other MFD examples too.
>>
>> So may be I am still missing something in your proposal.
> Why does it matter if it is a GPIO or MFD or whatever?
> The point is that the IRQ line passes thru something else,
> and this we model as an irqdomain.
>
> Anyway here is a silicon cascaded IRQ chip:
> arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c
> See versatile_init_irq():
>
> __vic_init(VA_VIC_BASE, IRQ_VIC_START, ~0, 0, np);
> (...)
> fpga_irq_init(VA_SIC_BASE, "SIC", IRQ_SIC_START,
>                 IRQ_VICSOURCE31, PIC_VALID, np);
>
> The VIC in the versatile has the SIC cascaded from one of
> its IRQ lines. Both the VIC and SIC (fpga IRQ) are
> using irqdomains so the SIC spawns a child irqdomain
> from IRQ 31 (last IRQ) of the VIC.
 Ok, this is a typical example of irqchip cascaded.
> The difference with a crossbar is that it can software-config
> which IRQ goes where, and does not have a callback
> to clear interrupts or anything like that, it just passes them
> thru. But it is best modeled as an irqdomain IMO.
We can model crossbar as irqchip and gic as its interrupt parent
and peripherals to have crossbar as interrupt-parent.
   
 peripherals will do request_irq(crossbar_number)
              |
              |
 crossbar_unmask()
              |
              |
 maps crossbar number<->  to interrupt number and
 calls request_irq(int_no, crossbar_handler,..)

 
 crossbar_handler(interrupt number)
            |
            |
 get crossbar number from interrupt number
            |
            |
 handle_irq(crossbar_domain(crossbar number))
                                                                             

So this means a extra dummy handler.
Also the concern is by modelling it as irqchip, we will have
to find a different solution for DMA crossbar.

Regards,
 Sricharan