[PATCH 1/3] misc: Add crossbar driver
linus.walleij at linaro.org
Wed Aug 21 17:10:14 EDT 2013
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
<santosh.shilimkar at ti.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 15 August 2013 04:51 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Sorry I don't understand what thread that is... can you point me there?
>> My previous statement on this issue what this:
>>> I don't see how you can make this happen with an irqchip
>> I think my post above describes this.
> Sorry for being dumb but I don't think cascaded irqchip examples
> like GPIO and cross-bars are same. If you take an example of
> GPIO irqchip, it always have a physical connection even if it
> is 1 IRQ line for (32 logical/sparse IRQs). That goes with
> other MFD examples too.
> So may be I am still missing something in your proposal.
Why does it matter if it is a GPIO or MFD or whatever?
The point is that the IRQ line passes thru something else,
and this we model as an irqdomain.
Anyway here is a silicon cascaded IRQ chip:
__vic_init(VA_VIC_BASE, IRQ_VIC_START, ~0, 0, np);
fpga_irq_init(VA_SIC_BASE, "SIC", IRQ_SIC_START,
IRQ_VICSOURCE31, PIC_VALID, np);
The VIC in the versatile has the SIC cascaded from one of
its IRQ lines. Both the VIC and SIC (fpga IRQ) are
using irqdomains so the SIC spawns a child irqdomain
from IRQ 31 (last IRQ) of the VIC.
The difference with a crossbar is that it can software-config
which IRQ goes where, and does not have a callback
to clear interrupts or anything like that, it just passes them
thru. But it is best modeled as an irqdomain IMO.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel