[PATCH 0/3] refactor some ldb related clocks
Ying.Liu at freescale.com
Wed Aug 21 00:12:19 EDT 2013
On 08/21/2013 09:59 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> Hi Ying,
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:08:48PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
>>> While I admit to having introduced the combination of 1/3.5 fixed
>>> divider and configurable 1/1,1/2 divder clocks to describe this
>>> fractional divider for the reasons you state, I think the correct
>>> solution would be to improve the table divider to support fractional
>>> values and get rid of the virtual ldb_di<n>_div_3_5 clocks, not
>>> introduce more virtual clocks.
>> Yes, it's good to support fractional values for the table divider(not sure if there is any plan for this).
>> I see there is something similar in 'include/linux/sh_clk.h'.
> Yeah, I agree with Philipp on improving table divider to support
> fractional values. Would you like to work on that?
I don't have a plan to work on that now.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel