[PATCH 0/3] refactor some ldb related clocks
shawn.guo at linaro.org
Tue Aug 20 21:59:41 EDT 2013
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:08:48PM +0800, Liu Ying wrote:
> > While I admit to having introduced the combination of 1/3.5 fixed
> > divider and configurable 1/1,1/2 divder clocks to describe this
> > fractional divider for the reasons you state, I think the correct
> > solution would be to improve the table divider to support fractional
> > values and get rid of the virtual ldb_di<n>_div_3_5 clocks, not
> > introduce more virtual clocks.
> Yes, it's good to support fractional values for the table divider(not sure if there is any plan for this).
> I see there is something similar in 'include/linux/sh_clk.h'.
Yeah, I agree with Philipp on improving table divider to support
fractional values. Would you like to work on that?
More information about the linux-arm-kernel