[PATCH v2 0/2] omap4/twl6030: typical connection to omap4 as a separate dtsi file
bcousson at baylibre.com
Mon Aug 19 06:04:30 EDT 2013
On 19/08/2013 08:14, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
> Hi Benoit,
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Benoit Cousson <bcousson at baylibre.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ruslan,
>> On 16/08/2013 14:04, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
>>> Hi Benoit,
>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Benoit Cousson <bcousson at baylibre.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Ruslan,
>>>> On 14/08/2013 10:35, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
>>>>> There is no functional changes between v1 and v2 - just
>>>>> added the patch for omap4-var-som - Uri Yosef confirmed
>>>>> this board have the same connection of OMAP4<->TWL6030 as
>>>>> SDP4430 board
>>>> The series looks good to me, but it will be good to have a test for Panda
>>>> and Variscite boards before merging it.
>>> Okay, so I just verified this patch series on PandaBoard ES2. Should I
>>> resubmit this series with
>>> fixed commit message?
>> No, that's fine, I already applied it and fixed the subject and the changelog.
>> Here it is:
>> commit 2e25df1e5a4af906a9b25332719ace000063eb0d
>> Author: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol at ti.com>
>> Date: Wed Aug 14 11:35:47 2013 +0300
>> ARM: dts: twl6030: Move common configuration for OMAP4 boards in a separate dtsi file
>> The OMAP4 SoC family uses specially-designed PMIC (power management IC)
>> companion chip for power management needs: TWL6030/TWL6032.
>> Therefore there is a typical connection of PMIC to OMAP4 so we can
>> move it into separate .dtsi file and do not duplicate over
>> board-specific files.
>> Tested on OMAP4 SDP board and compile-tested for Panda board
> Just for archives: I've successfully tested it on PandaBoard ES2 last
> week as well.
Great, I'll update the changelog before pushing it.
>> Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol at ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <bcousson at baylibre.com>
>> Just let me know if you are OK with the updated version.
> Yes, this version looks good to me. Thanks for picking it up!
>>> However I cannot verify the patch for Variscite board because I do not
>>> own any such board so
>>> you can drop that patch. But maybe Uri Yosef can verify it. Uri?
>> It seems that Uri cannot test it right now, so I will have to drop that one.
> Okay, let's wait for Uri's verification.
I'll keep it for 3.13.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel