[PATCH v2 0/2] omap4/twl6030: typical connection to omap4 as a separate dtsi file
ruslan.bilovol at ti.com
Mon Aug 19 02:14:29 EDT 2013
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Benoit Cousson <bcousson at baylibre.com> wrote:
> Hi Ruslan,
> On 16/08/2013 14:04, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
>> Hi Benoit,
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Benoit Cousson <bcousson at baylibre.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Ruslan,
>>> On 14/08/2013 10:35, Ruslan Bilovol wrote:
>>>> There is no functional changes between v1 and v2 - just
>>>> added the patch for omap4-var-som - Uri Yosef confirmed
>>>> this board have the same connection of OMAP4<->TWL6030 as
>>>> SDP4430 board
>>> The series looks good to me, but it will be good to have a test for Panda
>>> and Variscite boards before merging it.
>> Okay, so I just verified this patch series on PandaBoard ES2. Should I
>> resubmit this series with
>> fixed commit message?
> No, that's fine, I already applied it and fixed the subject and the changelog.
> Here it is:
> commit 2e25df1e5a4af906a9b25332719ace000063eb0d
> Author: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol at ti.com>
> Date: Wed Aug 14 11:35:47 2013 +0300
> ARM: dts: twl6030: Move common configuration for OMAP4 boards in a separate dtsi file
> The OMAP4 SoC family uses specially-designed PMIC (power management IC)
> companion chip for power management needs: TWL6030/TWL6032.
> Therefore there is a typical connection of PMIC to OMAP4 so we can
> move it into separate .dtsi file and do not duplicate over
> board-specific files.
> Tested on OMAP4 SDP board and compile-tested for Panda board
Just for archives: I've successfully tested it on PandaBoard ES2 last
week as well.
> Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol at ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <bcousson at baylibre.com>
> Just let me know if you are OK with the updated version.
Yes, this version looks good to me. Thanks for picking it up!
>> However I cannot verify the patch for Variscite board because I do not
>> own any such board so
>> you can drop that patch. But maybe Uri Yosef can verify it. Uri?
> It seems that Uri cannot test it right now, so I will have to drop that one.
Okay, let's wait for Uri's verification.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel