[PATCH v3 1/2] dmaengine: add interface of dma_get_slave_channel
Vinod Koul
vinod.koul at intel.com
Mon Aug 19 01:25:16 EDT 2013
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 03:02:42PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> Suggested by Arnd, add dma_get_slave_channel interface
> Dma host driver could get specific channel specificied by request line, rather than filter.
>
> host example:
> static struct dma_chan *xx_of_dma_simple_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *dma_spec,
> struct of_dma *ofdma)
> {
> struct xx_dma_dev *d = ofdma->of_dma_data;
> unsigned int request = dma_spec->args[0];
>
> if (request > d->dma_requests)
> return NULL;
>
> return dma_get_slave_channel(&(d->chans[request].vc.chan));
> }
>
> probe:
> of_dma_controller_register((&op->dev)->of_node, xx_of_dma_simple_xlate, d);
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao at linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de>
> ---
> drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/dmaengine.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> index 9e56745..38dd8c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
> @@ -504,6 +504,31 @@ static struct dma_chan *private_candidate(const dma_cap_mask_t *mask,
> }
>
> /**
> + * dma_request_channel - try to get specific channel exclusively
> + * @chan: target channel
> + */
> +struct dma_chan *dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
> +{
> + int err = -EBUSY;
> +
> + /* lock against __dma_request_channel */
> + mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex);
> +
> + if (chan->client_count == 0) {
> + err = dma_chan_get(chan);
> + if (err)
> + pr_debug("%s: failed to get %s: (%d)\n",
> + __func__, dma_chan_name(chan), err);
> + } else
> + chan = NULL;
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);
> +
> + return chan;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_get_slave_channel);
No, this is not the right approach.
When patch is applied and you find an issue you fix the issue. I have already
pushed and merged this. So removing is a bad idea.
you provide a fix for this miss.
Also for this you need to give due credit to Dan (reporter). That is how the
process works.
Anyway I have applied the below fix and will push it out.
---
dmaengine: fix - error: potential NULL dereference 'chan'
commit 7bb587f4 "dmaengine: add interface of dma_get_slave_channel" introduced
the above error so fix it
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
Suggested-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao at linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com>
---
drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 10 +++++-----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
index 5932ab1..755ba2f 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
@@ -514,16 +514,16 @@ struct dma_chan *dma_get_slave_channel(struct dma_chan *chan)
/* lock against __dma_request_channel */
mutex_lock(&dma_list_mutex);
- if (chan->client_count == 0)
+ if (chan->client_count == 0) {
err = dma_chan_get(chan);
- else
+ if (err)
+ pr_debug("%s: failed to get %s: (%d)\n",
+ __func__, dma_chan_name(chan), err);
+ } else
chan = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&dma_list_mutex);
- if (err)
- pr_debug("%s: failed to get %s: (%d)\n",
- __func__, dma_chan_name(chan), err);
return chan;
}
--
~Vinod
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list