[PATCH 05/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Supply macros to resolve 'src' and 'dst' directions
Lee Jones
lee.jones at linaro.org
Thu Apr 25 05:19:06 EDT 2013
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > There are lots of lengthy if() statements located sporadically up and
> > down the driver. This simple macro should make many of them a little
> > simpler to decipher. The remainder have to stay in place, as they
> > detail slightly more specific settings.
> >
> > Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <djbw at fb.com>
> > Cc: Per Forlin <per.forlin at stericsson.com>
> > Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin at rab.in>
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
> (...)
>
> > +#define D40_IS_SRC(dir) ((dir == STEDMA40_PERIPH_TO_MEM) ? true : false)
>
> And when I reas the code and see D40_IS_SRC, what does that
> mean? That the channel is a source of .. what exactly?
>
> The older explicit comparison would be more informative.
>
> > +#define D40_IS_DST(dir) (((dir == STEDMA40_MEM_TO_PERIPH) || \
> > + (dir == STEDMA40_MEM_TO_MEM)) ? true : false)
> > +
>
> The comparison to STEDMA40_MEM_TO_MEM is unintelligible, if I see
> that macro it has a very unintuitive name, since it is not just
> DST but also SRC.
>
> The latter macro would be named somthing like D40_IS_DST_OR_MEM2MEM
> and then it will not simplify the code very much.
>
> You need to come up with something different here, this is just making the
> driver harder to understand.
>
> I think this patch should be just dropped.
Okay.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list