[PATCH 05/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Supply macros to resolve 'src' and 'dst' directions
Linus Walleij
linus.walleij at linaro.org
Thu Apr 25 04:22:13 EDT 2013
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
> There are lots of lengthy if() statements located sporadically up and
> down the driver. This simple macro should make many of them a little
> simpler to decipher. The remainder have to stay in place, as they
> detail slightly more specific settings.
>
> Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com>
> Cc: Dan Williams <djbw at fb.com>
> Cc: Per Forlin <per.forlin at stericsson.com>
> Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin at rab.in>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org>
(...)
> +#define D40_IS_SRC(dir) ((dir == STEDMA40_PERIPH_TO_MEM) ? true : false)
And when I reas the code and see D40_IS_SRC, what does that
mean? That the channel is a source of .. what exactly?
The older explicit comparison would be more informative.
> +#define D40_IS_DST(dir) (((dir == STEDMA40_MEM_TO_PERIPH) || \
> + (dir == STEDMA40_MEM_TO_MEM)) ? true : false)
> +
The comparison to STEDMA40_MEM_TO_MEM is unintelligible, if I see
that macro it has a very unintuitive name, since it is not just
DST but also SRC.
The latter macro would be named somthing like D40_IS_DST_OR_MEM2MEM
and then it will not simplify the code very much.
You need to come up with something different here, this is just making the
driver harder to understand.
I think this patch should be just dropped.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list