[PATCH 03/10] msm: iommu: Convert to clk_prepare/unprepare
Saravana Kannan
skannan at codeaurora.org
Mon Sep 24 18:32:29 EDT 2012
On 09/20/2012 07:26 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Add calls to clk_prepare and unprepare so that MSM can migrate to
> the common clock framework. We never unprepare the clocks until
> driver remove because the clocks are enabled and disabled in irq
> context. Finer grained power management is possible in the future
> via runtime power management techniques.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd<sboyd at codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/msm_iommu_dev.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu_dev.c b/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu_dev.c
> index 8e8fb07..d344f6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/msm_iommu_dev.c
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int msm_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto fail;
> }
>
> - ret = clk_enable(iommu_pclk);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(iommu_pclk);
> if (ret)
> goto fail_enable;
>
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static int msm_iommu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (clk_get_rate(iommu_clk) == 0)
> clk_set_min_rate(iommu_clk, 1);
>
> - ret = clk_enable(iommu_clk);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(iommu_clk);
> if (ret) {
> clk_put(iommu_clk);
> goto fail_pclk;
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ fail_clk:
> clk_put(iommu_clk);
> }
> fail_pclk:
> - clk_disable(iommu_pclk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(iommu_pclk);
> fail_enable:
> clk_put(iommu_pclk);
> fail:
> @@ -275,8 +275,11 @@ static int msm_iommu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> drv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> if (drv) {
> - if (drv->clk)
> + if (drv->clk) {
> + clk_unprepare(drv->clk);
> clk_put(drv->clk);
> + }
> + clk_unprepare(drv->pclk);
Are these changes right? Every other clk API change in this patch is
using the combined prepare_enable/disable_unprepare() calls. So, when
would we end up at this location with the clocks prepared but not enabled?
Also, what if the device gets probed and then immediately removed. Will
it work correctly?
-Saravana
> clk_put(drv->pclk);
> memset(drv, 0, sizeof(*drv));
> kfree(drv);
> @@ -314,14 +317,14 @@ static int msm_iommu_ctx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx_drvdata->attached_elm);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctx_drvdata);
>
> - ret = clk_enable(drvdata->pclk);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(drvdata->pclk);
> if (ret)
> goto fail;
>
> if (drvdata->clk) {
> - ret = clk_enable(drvdata->clk);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(drvdata->clk);
> if (ret) {
> - clk_disable(drvdata->pclk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(drvdata->pclk);
> goto fail;
> }
> }
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list