[alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 00/34] i.MX multi-platform support

Olof Johansson olof at lixom.net
Sat Sep 22 03:41:32 EDT 2012


On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:46:26AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
>> I just published the branch below with this series rebased on top of
>> the necessary dependant branches.
>>   git://git.linaro.org/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git staging/imx-multiplatform
>> The dependant branches include:
> Forgot the base:
>   * arm-soc/next/multiplatform
> Shawn
>> * arm-soc/multiplatform/platform-data
>> * arm-soc/multiplatform/smp_ops
>> * git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-3.7
>>   It contains dependant patch "ASoC: mx27vis: retrieve gpio numbers
>>   from platform_data"
>> * git://git.infradead.org/mtd-2.6.git master
>>   The series is based on this tree to solve some non-trivial conflicts
>>   on mxc_nand driver.  Because mtd tree completely missed 3.6 merge
>>   window, having the series base on 3.6-rc actually means 3.5 code base
>>   in term of mtd support.  There are currently two cycles changes
>>   accumulated on mtd, and we need to base the series on it to sort out
>>   the conflicts.
>> * git://linuxtv.org/mchehab/media-next.git master
>>   The media tree renames mx2/mx3 camera drivers twice.  I'm not sure
>>   if git merge can detect them, so I just rebased the series on media
>>   tree to solve that.  The bonus point is that a number of trivial
>>   conflicts with imx27-coda support on media tree gets solved as well.
>> I'm not requesting you to pull the branch into arm-soc as a stable
>> branch but staging one, because the external dependencies which might
>> not be stable.  I attempt to use it for exposing the series on
>> linux-next, so that we can send it to Linus for 3.7 if there is chance
>> for us to (e.g. all the dependant branches hit mainline early during
>> 3.7 merge window).

I've pulled this in now as staging/imx-multiplatform.

As you mention, it might or might not make sense to send this up. It
also accrued a few more merge conflicts with other branches in
arm-soc, so we'll see how things play out.

Either way, we'll for sure queue it for 3.8.


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list