rcu self-detected stall messages on OMAP3, 4 boards
Paul E. McKenney
paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Sep 21 15:57:17 EDT 2012
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 07:11:14PM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 06:08:59PM +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> >
> > > As far as I know, our only idle entry point is in
> > > arch/arm/common/process.c:cpu_idle().
> >
> > In mainline, this is arch/arm/kernel/process.c, correct?
>
> Indeed; sorry about that, mistyped.
No problem!
> > > Looking at the x86 idle entry, they call rcu_idle_{enter,exit}() inside
> > > {stop,start}_critical_timings(). Making that change here didn't help.
> >
> > The reason x86 does this is that they have idle notifiers deeper in the
> > idle loop that use RCU read-side critical sections. So this was an
> > expected result.
>
> OK
>
> > > Also tried commenting out the code from the stop_critical_timings() call
> > > to the WARN_ON(irqs_disabled()), and adding a local_irq_enable(). That
> > > also didn't help, which suggests that the problem is not caused by the
> > > OMAP-specific PM idle code.
> >
> > I must admit that you make a convincing case here. Though it does leave
> > me wondering what is different about Panda (and MX28, IIRC).
>
> Given the dependency on CONFIG_NO_HZ, the stalls are probably dependent on
> the userspace in use. The userspaces here are quite minimal and so allow
> the system to stay idle for relatively long periods of time.
Could you please point me to a recipe for creating a minimal userspace?
Just in case it is the userspac erather than the architecture/hardware
that makes the difference.
> > I may take your advice of remote access to a Panda board, though that
> > is likely to take a bit of time due to timezones. Regardless of the
> > underlying issue here, I clearly need to make the stall-warning messages
> > do a better job of printing out needed information.
>
> If you've got a patch in mind for that, I'll boot it here.
Hammering it out, will send it along when it is a bit less destructive. ;-)
> One other observation. omap2plus_defconfig sets CONFIG_NO_HZ=y but
> doesn't set CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ. The stall warning messages still
> appear when CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y. One of them is attached below (with
> CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_INFO set as well, obviously).
Just to make sure I understand the combinations:
o All stalls have happened when running a minimal userspace.
o CONFIG_NO_HZ=n suppresses the stalls.
o CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ (which depends on CONFIG_NO_HZ=y) has
no observable effect on the stalls.
Did I get that right, or am I missing a combination?
> As an aside, in the CONFIG_RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=y build, I dropped a printk()
> into rcu_idle_gp_timer_func() and it doesn't look like it ever executed.
Indeed, rcu_idle_gp_timer_func() is a bit strange in that it is cancelled
upon exit from idle, and therefore should (almost) never actually execute.
Its sole purpose is to wake up the CPU. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> - Paul
>
> [ 305.832000] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
> [ 305.834838] 1: (2 GPs behind) idle=5b1/1/0 drain=0 . timer=4294967295
> [ 305.838378] (t=17463 jiffies)
> [ 305.840118] [<c001be10>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c00ad65c>] (rcu_pending+0xd0/0x540)
> [ 305.844848] [<c00ad65c>] (rcu_pending+0xd0/0x540) from [<c00ae5cc>] (rcu_check_callbacks+0x110/0x198)
> [ 305.849884] [<c00ae5cc>] (rcu_check_callbacks+0x110/0x198) from [<c0053800>] (update_process_times+0x38/0x68)
> [ 305.855285] [<c0053800>] (update_process_times+0x38/0x68) from [<c008cf40>] (tick_sched_timer+0x80/0xec)
> [ 305.860473] [<c008cf40>] (tick_sched_timer+0x80/0xec) from [<c006942c>] (__run_hrtimer+0x7c/0x1e0)
> [ 305.865356] [<c006942c>] (__run_hrtimer+0x7c/0x1e0) from [<c006a210>] (hrtimer_interrupt+0x11c/0x2d0)
> [ 305.870361] [<c006a210>] (hrtimer_interrupt+0x11c/0x2d0) from [<c001a54c>] (twd_handler+0x30/0x44)
> [ 305.875274] [<c001a54c>] (twd_handler+0x30/0x44) from [<c00a8128>] (handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x13c)
> [ 305.880371] [<c00a8128>] (handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x13c) from [<c00a489c>] (generic_handle_irq+0x30/0x48)
> [ 305.885833] [<c00a489c>] (generic_handle_irq+0x30/0x48) from [<c0014fb8>] (handle_IRQ+0x4c/0xac)
> [ 305.890624] [<c0014fb8>] (handle_IRQ+0x4c/0xac) from [<c000864c>] (gic_handle_irq+0x28/0x5c)
> [ 305.895233] [<c000864c>] (gic_handle_irq+0x28/0x5c) from [<c04fbc64>] (__irq_svc+0x44/0x5c)
> [ 305.899780] Exception stack(0xde86ff88 to 0xde86ffd0)
> [ 305.902526] ff80: 0004c062 00000001 00000000 de8660c0 de86e000 c07c42c8
> [ 305.906982] ffa0: c05075a0 c074bdd0 00000000 411fc092 c074bff0 00000000 00000001 de86ffd0
> [ 305.911437] ffc0: 0004c063 c00152b0 20000113 ffffffff
> [ 305.914184] [<c04fbc64>] (__irq_svc+0x44/0x5c) from [<c00152b0>] (default_idle+0x20/0x44)
> [ 305.918640] [<c00152b0>] (default_idle+0x20/0x44) from [<c00154dc>] (cpu_idle+0x9c/0x114)
> [ 305.923126] [<c00154dc>] (cpu_idle+0x9c/0x114) from [<804f4a34>] (0x804f4a34)
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list