Tracking down suspend/resume ext3/mmc issues on imx233

Pavel Machek pavel at
Wed Sep 19 19:23:49 EDT 2012

On Mon 2012-09-10 12:33:45, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:11:48AM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better if the root filesystem was marked as
> > non-removable in the device tree - or in the case of a truly removable
> > card, just marked in the MMC subsystem - and the MMC subsystem skipped
> > the "it could be removed" for suspend/resume operations?
> I agree, this makes a lot of sense.  If the root file system
> disappears, you're toasted either way, so it's fair to assume that the
> device on which the root file system is located should is
> non-removable.

I'm not sure I agree.

If you treat root fs as removable, you'll get "crash". You'll need to
replay the journal, but data is safe.

If you treat it as non-removable, and someone manages to remove it,
mount, and reinsert, you'll get silent data corruption.

If the card is not removable, mark it as such...
(cesky, pictures)

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list