[PATCH 17/24] ARM: OMAP: use __iomem pointers for MMIO
Arnd Bergmann
arnd at arndb.de
Wed Sep 19 09:35:47 EDT 2012
On Monday 17 September 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> [120916 13:39]:
> > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd at arndb.de> [120915 13:15]:
> > > On Saturday 15 September 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > With my patches, this is now all omap1 specific and
> > > > moved to arch/arm/mach-omap1/include/mach/hardware.h.
> > > > It's probably easiest to just update this patch on
> > > > top of the hardware.h changes I've done.
> > >
> > > Yes, sounds good. Do you want to send a patch for that
> > > and let me drop this one then?
> >
> > Yes I can pick this one and update it against one of my
> > branches to avoid merge conflicts.
>
> This applies against mach-omap1/include/mach/hardware.h
> with some fuzz so no issues there.
>
> But I think we should not apply it as these are physical
> addresses, not virtual addresses for omap1.
Right, I misread what is actually going on here because the
only driver I looked at treated the address as a virtual
address pointer.
> We have IOMEM already in use for omap_read/write because of:
>
> #define OMAP1_IO_ADDRESS(pa) IOMEM((pa) - OMAP1_IO_OFFSET)
>
> I think the right solution is to eventually get rid of
> omap_read/write for omap1 also and replace them with ioremap
> + readl/writel.
Agreed.
> Or am I missing something?
I did not see any new warnings for omap1, but I did see this
on omap2plus_defconfig:
drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c: In function 'omap_wdt_ioctl':
drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c:222:4: error: passing argument 1 of '__raw_readw' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror]
arch/arm/include/asm/io.h:71:90: note: expected 'const volatile void *' but argument is of type 'unsigned int'
It seems I misinterpreted this, and it's actually a bug in the watchdog
driver that should be fixed using this patch instead (and backport it
to stable)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
index fceec4f..7b45802 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
@@ -218,9 +218,11 @@ static long omap_wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
case WDIOC_GETSTATUS:
return put_user(0, (int __user *)arg);
case WDIOC_GETBOOTSTATUS:
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1
if (cpu_is_omap16xx())
- return put_user(__raw_readw(ARM_SYSST),
+ return put_user(omap_readw(ARM_SYSST),
(int __user *)arg);
+#endif
if (cpu_is_omap24xx())
return put_user(omap_prcm_get_reset_sources(),
(int __user *)arg);
This bug seems to have been introduced in 2008 by 9f69e3b0c "[WATCHDOG]
omap_wdt.c: another ioremap() fix" without anyone ever noticing and now
got caught. Of course it should be replaced by something better when
omap_read/write is finally getting removed.
I'll drop my omap patch for now, because it's obviously wrong, and let
you guys figure out what to do about the watchdog driver.
Arnd
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list