[PATCH] ARM: smp_twd: reprogram twd based on clk notifier
Mike Turquette
mturquette at linaro.org
Wed Sep 12 16:32:23 EDT 2012
Quoting Linus Walleij (2012-09-12 09:07:51)
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> -static struct notifier_block twd_cpufreq_nb = {
> >> - .notifier_call = twd_cpufreq_transition,
> >> +static struct notifier_block twd_clk_nb = {
> >> + .notifier_call = twd_rate_change,
> >
> > But what happens if there is a platform which is now using this through
> > cpufreq and has not yet switched to the common clock? It regresses
> > right, because no notifications arrive anymore? Does it even compile?
>
> Bah too late in the afternoon :-(
>
> So the real question is - are we sure that imx6 is the last platform
> migrated to common clock of all those using the CPUfreq scaling
> (this seems to be the last piece) such that
> we don't break anything....
>
OMAP will break. My original version of this patch had "HACK:" in the
$subject since it was just a demo of the notifiers.
I'll submit a new version with some #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK bits ASAP.
Regards,
Mike
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list