[PATCH 00/29] Move OMAP2+ over to use COMMON clock
Hiremath, Vaibhav
hvaibhav at ti.com
Tue Sep 11 23:53:25 EDT 2012
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:40:51, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
> > I tried this branch on BeagleBone platform and needs one small typo
> > correction in hwmod data patch (submitted earlier, which you are going
> > to queue it)
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
> > index de7a3ab..767a77d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
> > @@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod am33xx_mmc2_hwmod = {
> > .clkdm_name = "l3s_clkdm",
> > .mpu_irqs = am33xx_mmc2_irqs,
> > .sdma_reqs = am33xx_mmc2_edma_reqs,
> > - .main_clk = "mmc2_fck",
> > + .main_clk = "mmc_clk",
> > .prcm = {
> > .omap4 = {
> > .clkctrl_offs = AM33XX_CM_PER_MMC2_CLKCTRL_OFFSET,
> >
> >
> > With above change I boot tested it on BeagleBone platform and also
> > verified the clock rates getting printed in debugfs.
>
> So does this mean we need to put together a patch to remove the existing
> mmc2_fck first from the OMAP clock data file? Looks like that would be
> the right thing to do, based on the AM33x PRCM data.
>
Yes, that's correct and it has been already removed from clock data file
while migrating to common clock framework.
Thanks,
Vaibhav
>
> - Paul
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list