[PATCH 00/29] Move OMAP2+ over to use COMMON clock

Hiremath, Vaibhav hvaibhav at ti.com
Tue Sep 11 23:53:25 EDT 2012


On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 04:40:51, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
> 
> > I tried this branch on BeagleBone platform and needs one small typo
> > correction in hwmod data patch (submitted earlier, which you are going
> > to queue it)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
> > index de7a3ab..767a77d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_33xx_data.c
> > @@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod am33xx_mmc2_hwmod = {
> >         .clkdm_name     = "l3s_clkdm",
> >         .mpu_irqs       = am33xx_mmc2_irqs,
> >         .sdma_reqs      = am33xx_mmc2_edma_reqs,
> > -       .main_clk       = "mmc2_fck",
> > +       .main_clk       = "mmc_clk",
> >         .prcm           = {
> >                 .omap4  = {
> >                       .clkctrl_offs = AM33XX_CM_PER_MMC2_CLKCTRL_OFFSET,
> > 
> > 
> > With above change I boot tested it on BeagleBone platform and also
> > verified the clock rates getting printed in debugfs.
> 
> So does this mean we need to put together a patch to remove the existing 
> mmc2_fck first from the OMAP clock data file?  Looks like that would be 
> the right thing to do, based on the AM33x PRCM data.
> 

Yes, that's correct and it has been already removed from clock data file 
while migrating to common clock framework.

Thanks,
Vaibhav

> 
> - Paul
> 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list