GCC 4.6.x miscompiling arm-linux?
David Jander
david.jander at protonic.nl
Tue Sep 11 05:31:39 EDT 2012
On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:48:53 +0200
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer at pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 09:27:53AM +0200, David Jander wrote:
> >
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > > @ Function supports interworking.
> > > @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
> > > @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
> > > @ link register save eliminated.
> > > cmp r0, #9
> > > mov r3, #0
> > > str r3, [r1, #0]
> > > mov r0, #0
> > > strgt r3, [r1, #4]
> > > bx lr
> > > .size flexcan_chip_start, .-flexcan_chip_start
> > > .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.3.3"
> > > .section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits
> > >
> > > I think this looks correct. Perhaps you could try the angstrom arm5te
> > > toolchain and see if it's a toolchain issue?
> >
> > Yes, this looks a lot better, and is exactly what I get when I compile this
> > code with CodeSourcery GCC-4.4.1
> >
> > I have tries building gcc-4.6.3 also with OSELAS/PTXdist, and it gives the
> > same (wrong) result as with gcc-4.6.2
>
> AFAIK our OSELAS/PTXdist Toolchains use Linaro patches, this would
> explain why both have the same result.
It would indeed, if I had just used OSELAS as-is, but I didn't ;-)
I made a copy of
arm-v5te-linux-gnueabi_gcc-4.6.2_glibc-2.14.1_binutils-2.21.1a_kernel-2.6.39-sanitized.ptxconfig
and replaced the version string 4.6.2 with 4.6.3. AFAIK, this way PTXdist will
download pristine gcc-4.6.3 sources and not apply any patches, since there is
no directory named patches/gcc-4.6.3, right? Can I assume that I have an
unpatched version of gcc-4.6.3 then?
Btw, Here's what I get from it:
flexcan_chip_start:
@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
@ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
@ link register save eliminated.
mov r3, #0
cmp r0, #9
str r3, [r1, #0]
ldrle r3, [r1, #4]
mov r0, #0
str r3, [r1, #4]
bx lr
.size flexcan_chip_start, .-flexcan_chip_start
.ident "GCC: (OSELAS.Toolchain-2011.11.1) 4.6.3"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",%progbits
Wrong code.
See the version string? It is clearly not an existing OSELAS version.
Best regards,
--
David Jander
Protonic Holland.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list