[PATCH 07/17] Input: omap-keypad: Remove dependencies to mach includes

[Tony Lindgren]

* Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com> [120910 23:02]:
> 
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP1
> > +#define omap_kp_24xx()		0
> > +#else
> > +#define omap_kp_24xx()		1
> > +#endif
> 
> I would rather use revision detection or different driver names (if
> revision register is broken).

Hmm actually looks like we can actually remove all the omap2+
support as we no longer have any users for this one. I think I
already converted the last one to matrix-keypad a while back.
 
> > +static struct omap_kp *omap_kp;
> 
> please don't. This will prevent multiple instances of this driver. Even
> though I don't think we will ever have an omap with multiple keypad
> instances, it's still not a good practice IMHO.
> 
> Also, this ends up being "hidden" (if you have a better work let me
> know) in most functions since they either pass omap_kp as argument or
> define a local omap_kp variable.

Yeah good point, I'll update that and remove the omap2+ support
for this driver.
 
> Sourav, is the revision register on this IP working fine across multiple
> OMAPs ?

Sounds like no need for that, as we're no longer using this for
omap2+..
 
> > @@ -253,9 +256,9 @@ static ssize_t omap_kp_enable_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute
> >  	mutex_lock(&kp_enable_mutex);
> >  	if (state != kp_enable) {
> >  		if (state)
> > -			enable_irq(INT_KEYBOARD);
> > +			enable_irq(omap_kp->irq);
> >  		else
> > -			disable_irq(INT_KEYBOARD);
> > +			disable_irq(omap_kp->irq);
> 
> GREAT!! :-)

Heh yeah that nice way to do it :)
 
> >  static int __devinit omap_kp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> > -	struct omap_kp *omap_kp;
> 
> ???? I don't see the point for that global omap_kp, actually ...

Yes you're right. Will send an updated one tomorrow.

Regards,

Tony