[PATCH] ARM: dts: AM33XX: fix gpio node numbering to match hardware

Hiremath, Vaibhav hvaibhav at ti.com
Tue Sep 11 01:00:15 EDT 2012


On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 22:29:21, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 06:52 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> >> + Tony
> >>
> >> Hi Matt,
> >>
> >> 30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
> >>
> >> There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so I'll take them
> >> and send a for_3.7/dts-part2 pull request if this is not too late for Tony.
> > 
> > Yeah, believe me, I did a faceplant when I saw your pull request come by
> > at the same time I discovered this issue. ;) In particular, AnilKumar's
> > user leds patch would need to be adjusted for this change. I can
> > resubmit with the user leds dts changes adjusted as well if that
> > discussion comes to a conclusion and his patches accepted.
> 
> Yeah, I was wondering if the gpios label were already used somewhere.
> I've just added this patch on top of my current series.
> So you or Anil should just post the missing patches whenever they'll be
> available and accepted.
> 
> >> On 09/10/2012 06:20 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> >>> On AM33xx, the datasheet and TRM refer to four GPIO instances that
> >>> are 0-based, GPIO0-3.
> >>
> >> Or maybe you should just update the spec to use a 1-based GPIO number
> >> like OMAP :-)
> > 
> > I am powerless here. :)
> 
> That's too bad :-(
> 

I agree with Matt here. Also at this point of time it is too much change to 
modify spec for this, and certainly it would be very confusing. 


Thanks,
Vaibhav

> Benoit
> 
> > 
> > -Matt
> > 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Matt Porter <mporter at ti.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi |    8 ++++----
> >>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> >>> index bb31bff..1369bfc 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
> >>> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
> >>>  			reg = <0x48200000 0x1000>;
> >>>  		};
> >>>  
> >>> -		gpio1: gpio at 44e07000 {
> >>> +		gpio0: gpio at 44e07000 {
> >>>  			compatible = "ti,omap4-gpio";
> >>>  			ti,hwmods = "gpio1";
> >>>  			gpio-controller;
> >>> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
> >>>  			interrupts = <96>;
> >>>  		};
> >>>  
> >>> -		gpio2: gpio at 4804c000 {
> >>> +		gpio1: gpio at 4804c000 {
> >>>  			compatible = "ti,omap4-gpio";
> >>>  			ti,hwmods = "gpio2";
> >>>  			gpio-controller;
> >>> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
> >>>  			interrupts = <98>;
> >>>  		};
> >>>  
> >>> -		gpio3: gpio at 481ac000 {
> >>> +		gpio2: gpio at 481ac000 {
> >>>  			compatible = "ti,omap4-gpio";
> >>>  			ti,hwmods = "gpio3";
> >>>  			gpio-controller;
> >>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
> >>>  			interrupts = <32>;
> >>>  		};
> >>>  
> >>> -		gpio4: gpio at 481ae000 {
> >>> +		gpio3: gpio at 481ae000 {
> >>>  			compatible = "ti,omap4-gpio";
> >>>  			ti,hwmods = "gpio4";
> >>>  			gpio-controller;
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list