[PATCH 1/4] clk: Provide option for clk_get_rate to issue hw for new rate
Mike Turquette
mturquette at ti.com
Thu Sep 6 20:19:27 EDT 2012
Quoting Ulf Hansson (2012-09-06 02:09:33)
> On 31 August 2012 21:29, Mike Turquette <mturquette at ti.com> wrote:
> > This is a bit subtle. Calling __clk_recalc_rates will walk the subtree
> > of children recalculating rates as well as firing off notifiers. Is
> > this what you want? If your clock changes rates behind your back AND
> > has chilren then this is probably the right thing to do. However you
> > might be better off with:
> >
> > if (clk && (clk->flags & CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE))
> > rate = clk->ops->recalc_rate(clk->hw, clk->parent->rate);
> >
> > This doesn't update children or fire off notifiers. What is best for
> > your platform?
>
> For my platform, ux500 and for the clock connected to this
> patchseries, your suggesting above is enough. (Well some additional
> error handling is needed in your code proposal though :-) )
>
> The reason for why I used "__clk_recalc_rates" was because I think it
> could make sense to have a more generic approach, not sure if it is
> needed as you mention. Additionally, using __clk_recalc_rates with
> "0" as the notification argument, should prevent notifications from
> happen, right?
>
You are right. I didn't catch that when running through this patch the
first time.
> So basically, I wanted the clock rates for the children to be updated
> as well as the parent clock rate, but no notifications.
>
This is the answer I was looking for. You DO want to walk the subtree
of children and recalc the rates. Since you are the first user of such
a feature I am happy to shape it for your needs ;-)
> I can happily update the patch according to your proposal if you still
> think it is the best way to do it, just tell me again then. :-)
>
No your patch does the right thing for your platform and looks sane and
generic for others. I feel much better about not firing off random
notifiers (which I missed when I reviewed your patch last time).
I'll take this series into clk-next.
Regards,
Mike
> Kind regards
> Ulf Hansson
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list