[PATCH 3/3] i2c: nomadik: Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver
Lee Jones
lee.jones at linaro.org
Mon Sep 3 09:28:50 EDT 2012
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 03:19:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones at linaro.org> wrote:
>
> > When booting DT booting take a different path and no platform data
> > is passed. We can't boot DT AND register devices with platform data
> > or else we will double probe every device. The only way to pass
> > pdata when booting with DT is with AUX_DATA() and that's a hack to
> > get around things we don't have support for yet. Up until now that
> > has been DMA bindings, clock and pinctrl names and call-backs.
>
> So if we pass some augmented platform data using AUX_DATA()
> that appears as pdata in this case, and gets discarded.
>
> Thus we cannot use AUX_DATA() to override a broken, as in
> "the interrupt number is wrong" device tree.
No, you cannot to that. You'd have to fix it in DT (which is easier).
> > If DT is corrupt or missing the kernel will boot using platform
> > data, but np will always be NULL, so we don't have the problem you
> > were alluding to above.
>
> That was not the problem I had in mind.
>
> I had a valid, but incorrect device tree in mind. I.e the device
> is there, but with wrong base address, or wrong IRQ number.
>
> If pdata takes precedence, we can use AUX_DATA() to
> override such errors from the platform, since drivers/of/platform.c
> helpfully pokes in the auxdata as the platform data.
Yes, that's what happens.
> I thought this was one of the reasons why auxdata exist
> at all.
I don't think so. I've been told that AUXDATA is just a hack. My
aim is to rid the boardfile of all AUXDATA entries.
> Or is the proper solution to runtime-patch the device tree
> per se in such cases? How is that actually done then?
No, you can't do that either. DT is only read once at boot-time.
The correct solution would be to fix the broken DT.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list