[PATCH 5/5] of: Modify c_can binding documentation
AnilKumar, Chimata
anilkumar at ti.com
Mon Sep 3 00:35:39 EDT 2012
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for the review,
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:32:38, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/01/2012 12:05 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 14:59:21, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> >> Modify c_can binding documentation according to recent review comments
> >> on device tree data addition patches.
>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/c_can.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/c_can.txt
> >> index a43f083..90a70be 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/c_can.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/c_can.txt
> >> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ Required properties:
> >> registers map
> >> - interrupts : property with a value describing the interrupt
> >> number
> >> +- status : describes the node status either "disabled" or
> >> + "okay"
>
> That's a standrd property that applies to any node, and doesn't describe
> data required by the device itself (as do regs/interrupts) by simply
> whether the node is activated; I'm not sure it's worth mentioning it in
> a device-specific binding.
>
> A similar comment exists for the pre-existing description of
> interrupt-parent below.
>
> >> Optional properties:
> >> - interrupt-parent : The parent interrupt controller
>
Then, I will remove these properties from the doc.
Thanks
AnilKumar
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list