[PATCH v4 5/5] zynq: move static peripheral mappings
Nick Bowler
nbowler at elliptictech.com
Thu Oct 25 16:17:01 EDT 2012
Hi Josh,
On 2012-10-24 15:04 -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> Shifting them up into the vmalloc region prevents the following warning,
> when booting a zynq qemu target with more than 512mb of RAM:
[...]
> -/* For now, all mappings are flat (physical = virtual)
> +/* Static peripheral mappings are mapped at the top of the
> + * vmalloc region
> */
> -#define UART0_PHYS 0xE0000000
> -#define UART0_VIRT UART0_PHYS
> +#define UART0_PHYS 0xE0000000
> +#define UART0_SIZE SZ_4K
> +#define UART0_VIRT (VMALLOC_END - UART0_SIZE)
Did you test this on any real hardware? I can't get the ZC702 to work
with the UART mapped at this address (this ends up being mapped at
0xFEFFF000), although I can't for the life of me figure out why the
virtual address even matters. Note that for the ZC702, the physical
address of the "main" UART is 0xE0001000.
All I end up seeing is "Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the
kernel." with no further messages. With the UART mapped at
0xF0001000, all printouts make it to the console. I tried a couple
different virtual addresses and I'm surprised at the results, since
the behaviour seems to vary wildly. I saw three behaviours depending
only on the virtual address of the static mapping; all results are 100%
reproducible:
"Works": all printouts make it to the console
"Fails": no printouts make it to the console after decompression
"Truncated": the first few lines of output do not make it to the
console, but after that it "Works". The first line
successfully printed is always
"Built 1 zonelists in Zone order, mobility grouping on. Total pages: 260096"
And here are the addresses I tested:
Address Result
-----------------------
0xf0000000 Truncated
0xf0001000 Works
0xf0007000 Truncated
0xf0008000 Fails
0xf0009000 Fails
0xf000e000 Truncated
0xf000f000 Fails
0xf8000000 Truncated
0xf8001000 Works
0xfef00000 Truncated
0xfef01000 Works
0xfef08000 Fails
0xfef0f000 Fails
0xfeff0000 Fails
0xfeff1000 Fails
0xfeffe000 Fails
0xfefff000 Fails
Judging by the list, the console seems to only work properly if the
defined virtual address is Fxxx1000 and xxx is not too big...
Confused,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list