OMAP baseline test results for v3.7-rc1
balbi at ti.com
Thu Oct 25 06:12:12 EDT 2012
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 09:23:03PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Jean Pihet wrote:
> >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet at newoldbits.com> wrote:
> >> > Do you have CPU_IDLE enabled?
> >> FYI the issue is not present with CPU_IDLE enabled.
> > Hmm, how can you tell? I thought you weren't able to reproduce it with
> > CPU_IDLE disabled either?
> I could not reproduce the issue, with and without CPU_IDLE enabled.
> What puzzles me is that the PM QoS code only has influence on the
> states chosen by cpuidle, so the change should not have any impact
> with CPU_IDLE enabled. I reallt need to reproduce the issue.
> Let me try with the same setup as yours (bootloader images,
> omap2pus_defconfig, angstrom roots).
I just sent a patch to fix a bug I found on OMAP4 panda but while
reading this thread again, I think it could be that it's the same bug
which is just easier to reproduce on Paul's setup.
Paul, Aaro, can you see if  makes the problem go away ? that would be
another reason to push  during this -rc cycle.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the linux-arm-kernel