[PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: governors: remove redundant code
Rafael J. Wysocki
rjw at sisk.pl
Wed Oct 24 17:12:13 EDT 2012
On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 21:43:46 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 of October 2012 11:37:13 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 22 October 2012 14:16, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On 20 October 2012 01:42, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org> wrote:
> > >> Initially ondemand governor was written and then using its code conservative
> > >> governor is written. It used a lot of code from ondemand governor, but copy of
> > >> code was created instead of using the same routines from both governors. Which
> > >> increased code redundancy, which is difficult to manage.
> > >>
> > >> This patch is an attempt to move common part of both the governors to
> > >> cpufreq_governor.c file to come over above mentioned issues.
> > >>
> > >> This shouldn't change anything from functionality point of view.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar at linaro.org>
> >
> > For everybody else, this patch is already pushed by Rafael in his linux-next
> > branch.
>
> Well, not yet, although I'm going to do that.
Or I would if it still applied. Unfortunately, though, it doesn't apply any
more to my linux-next branch due to some previous changes in it.
Care to rebase?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list