[PATCH 1/4] ARM: EXYNOS: Kconfig: Rename CPU_EXYNOS4210 to SOC_EXYNOS4210
Tomasz Figa
tomasz.figa at gmail.com
Tue Oct 23 14:29:49 EDT 2012
Hi Kgene,
Thanks for your comments.
On Tuesday 23 of October 2012 21:24:54 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Tomasz Figa wrote:
> > This patch renames CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210 to CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4210 to
> > match the convention used by rest of Exynos SoCs and correctly
> > represent the reality (Exynos4210 is a SoC, not a CPU).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa at samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park at samsung.com>
>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw at sisk.pl>
> Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham at samsung.com>
> Cc: Chris Ball <cjb at laptop.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij at linaro.org>
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang at intel.com>
>
> > ---
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 14 +++++++-------
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/Makefile | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/plat-samsung/include/plat/cpu.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 2 +-
> > drivers/devfreq/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c | 2 +-
> > drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 2 +-
> > 8 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
[snip]
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig b/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig
> > index f6b0a6e2..8545069 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig
> > @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ comment "DEVFREQ Drivers"
> >
> > config ARM_EXYNOS4_BUS_DEVFREQ
> >
> > bool "ARM Exynos4210/4212/4412 Memory Bus DEVFREQ Driver"
> >
> > - depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 || CPU_EXYNOS4212 || CPU_EXYNOS4412
> > + depends on SOC_EXYNOS4210 || CPU_EXYNOS4212 || CPU_EXYNOS4412
>
> (+ MyungJoo Ham)
>
> MyungJoo, should be fixed separately with this.
>
> 8<--------------------------------------
>
> From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim at samsung.com>
> Subject: PM / devfreq: fix the dependency for EXYNOS4212 and EXYNOS4412
>
> The CPU_EXYNOS4212 and CPU_EXYNOS4412 should be fixed.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig b/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig
> index f6b0a6e2..e73cede 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/Kconfig
> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ comment "DEVFREQ Drivers"
>
> config ARM_EXYNOS4_BUS_DEVFREQ
> bool "ARM Exynos4210/4212/4412 Memory Bus DEVFREQ Driver"
> - depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 || CPU_EXYNOS4212 || CPU_EXYNOS4412
> + depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 || SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412
> select ARCH_HAS_OPP
> select DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND
> help
> 8<--------------------------------------
Indeed, in result this would make my patch:
- depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210 || SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412
+ depends on SOC_EXYNOS4210 || SOC_EXYNOS4212 || SOC_EXYNOS4412
(with your patch as a dependency)
> > select ARCH_HAS_OPP
> > select DEVFREQ_GOV_SIMPLE_ONDEMAND
> > help
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c index a50c205..b090415 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-s3c.c
> > @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops sdhci_s3c_pmops = {
> >
> > #define SDHCI_S3C_PMOPS NULL
> > #endif
> >
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4212)
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4210) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4212)
> >
> > static struct sdhci_s3c_drv_data exynos4_sdhci_drv_data = {
> >
> > .sdhci_quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_NONSTANDARD_CLOCK,
> >
> > };
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> > b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c index 02d07bf..175ba6e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
> > @@ -1594,7 +1594,7 @@ static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data
> > s5pv210_serial_drv_data = {
> >
> > #define S5PV210_SERIAL_DRV_DATA (kernel_ulong_t)NULL
> > #endif
> >
> > -#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4212)
> > || \ +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4210) ||
> > defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4212) || \>
> > defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4412) || defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)
> >
> > static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data exynos4210_serial_drv_data = {
> >
> > .info = &(struct s3c24xx_uart_info) {
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.12
>
> Tomasz, looks ok to me but I think, accordingly, following should be
> updated together?
>
> 8<--------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> index a006f0d..3a665ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
> @@ -2790,7 +2790,7 @@ static __init void
> exynos_gpiolib_attach_ofnode(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
>
> static __init void exynos4_gpiolib_init(void)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4210
> struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip;
> int i, nr_chips;
> void __iomem *gpio_base1, *gpio_base2, *gpio_base3;
> @@ -2887,7 +2887,7 @@ static __init void exynos4_gpiolib_init(void)
> samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit_chips(exynos4_gpios_3,
> nr_chips, gpio_base3);
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210) && defined(CONFIG_S5P_GPIO_INT)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4210) && defined(CONFIG_S5P_GPIO_INT)
> s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIO_XA, 0, IRQ_GPIO1_NR_GROUPS);
> s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIO_XB, IRQ_GPIO1_NR_GROUPS,
> IRQ_GPIO2_NR_GROUPS);
> #endif
> @@ -2900,7 +2900,7 @@ err_ioremap2:
> iounmap(gpio_base1);
> err_ioremap1:
> return;
> -#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210 */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4210 */
> }
>
> static __init void exynos5_gpiolib_init(void)
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c
> b/drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c
> index fd03e85..8be9282 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/exynos_thermal.c
> @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ static struct thermal_sensor_conf exynos_sensor_conf
> = { .read_temperature = (int (*)(void *))exynos_tmu_read,
> };
>
> -#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_EXYNOS4210)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS4210)
> static struct exynos_tmu_platform_data const
> exynos4210_default_tmu_data = {
> .threshold = 80,
> .trigger_levels[0] = 5,
> 8<--------------------------------
Yes, I must have missed them somehow, will include these missing changes
in next version.
Best regards,
Tomasz Figa
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list